Economy Basic
Xiaomi Redmi 4a review: Economy Basic
Hardware overview
So, is there value to be had in owning the entry-level Xiaomi Redmi 4a? The phone was released in Xiaomi's home market at the end of last year but a belated premiere outside China has put it back in the spotlight - particularly in the emerging Indian market where it seems to be in pretty high demand. For one, the Redmi 4a feels pretty sturdy and well built. Naturally, it is plastic all around but the finish gives a convincing impression of metal.
The unibody design is even complete with a pair of grooves that resemble antenna strips. They are purely cosmetic, but reinforce the overall illusion of a metal chassis. The rear is pretty clean and simple. There is a single speaker grille near the bottom and the 13MP sensor is placed behind a pretty compact f/2.2 lens. There is no fingerprint reader - a notable omission compared to the standard Redmi 4. It's one of the sacrifices Xiaomi had to make in the name of ultimate savings.
Xiaomi Redmi 4a
The mono speaker on the Redmi 4a seems to be identical to that on the regular Redmi 4 and the 4 Prime. That is to say, it is not particularly loud and only scored an Average score in our tests.
| Speakerphone test | Voice, dB | Ringing | Overall score | |
| 62.0 | 62.1 | 66.6 | Below Average | |
| 64.1 | 65.3 | 68.5 | Below Average | |
| 62.9 | 65.2 | 71.6 | Below Average | |
| 63.1 | 67.3 | 71.3 | Average | |
| 62.8 | 67.5 | 72.1 | Average | |
| 65.9 | 66.1 | 75.7 | Average | |
| 66.2 | 70.5 | 72.5 | Good | |
| 68.7 | 66.6 | 75.7 | Good | |
| 66.5 | 71.1 | 74.4 | Good | |
| 65.4 | 69.1 | 84.2 | Good | |
| 67.3 | 70.3 | 81.5 | Very Good | |
| 66.1 | 69.0 | 84.1 | Very Good | |
| 65.1 | 70.7 | 86.8 | Very Good |
The front of the device follows the minimal, low-cost styling. The screen is a 720p unit, which seems the straightforward choice in this price bracket. The front is quite scratch-prone, even though Xiaomi claims it used some sort of reinforced glass other than the popular Gorilla Glass varieties. Our review unit managed to pick up a few marks from just lying around and the mostly indoor use during testing. A screen protector should be one of the first things on a new user's list.
Xiaomi Redmi 4a front
The three capacitive keys below the display work perfectly fine, but the lack of backlighting is a bit of a disadvantage. Not a big deal but you'll have to rely on habit in the absence of visual aids. Xiaomi might have found those three particular LEDs a bit too pricey to include but, ironically, they left the IR blaster from the rest of the Redmi 4 line intact, at the top side of the device.
Perhaps it would have cost more to redesign the frame and remove the cutout than to just leave the emitter in. In any case, you can pick a Redmi 4a up as an overdesigned universal remote to use around the house. But seriously, the IR is nice to have. Speaking of LEDs, there is also a notification LED underneath the Home button. An unusual position for sure, but still a welcome touch on such a cheap device.
Xiaomi Redmi 4a back
There is a 3.5mm audio jack and that's one thing the flagship Mi 6 can't match. It's at the top of the device, next to a secondary noise-canceling microphone. The bottom features the main microphone and a microUSB port. You'll be happy to learn it is OTG-enabled.
Xiaomi Redmi 4a back
As for the sides, there is a very standard arrangement including a volume rocker and a power button on the right and only a card compartment opposite. It has a total of 2 slots: a micro and a nano SIM. The latter is a hybrid, so you can opt for a microSD storage card in it instead. Both SIM slots are 4G-enabled, but only one can be active at a time.
Besides LTE, the Redmi 4a also comes with VoLTE support out of the box. In case you are wondering, this includes Reliance Jio as well. It even supports Band 5, which is widely used in India.
Some details on the Redmi 4a
And while we are at it, the Redmi 4a has the connectivity basics covered. There is Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n on board (single-band, nothing fancy), Bluetooth 4.1 with A2DP and LE and A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, for navigation.
NFC is a notable omission. Then again, we hardly see that on Redmi devices to begin with. On the other hand, Xiaomi has thrown in an FM radio receiver, for some old-school offline audio entertainment.
For wired connectivity, the Redmi 4a has a traditional microUSB connector, with a USB 2.0 controller behind it. Since the storage in the handset isn't all that fast either, anything beyond that in terms of bandwidth would have been overkill anyway. One thing we really do wish made the cut is fast charging, though.
Redmi 4a retail package • Hybrid SIM tray
The Redmi 4a comes with a 1A basic charger in what's a pretty basic retail package, as you would expect. Besides the charger, there is also a USB cable, a SIM ejector and some leaflets.
Battery
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a is powered by a 3,120mAh battery. It is a sealed-in pack, and it's pretty slow to charge up.
We can't help but feel that Xiaomi crippled its capacity in order to save on costs, rather than just for space, as is usually the case with today's smartphones. The regular Redmi 4, as well as the Redmi 4X both have 4,100mAh battery packs. With a size of 139.2 x 70 x 8.7mm and 139.9 x 70.4 x 8.5mm for the 4X and 4A, respectively, we definitely think cutting the capacity was a market decision more than anything else. And, as expected, the Redmi 4a definitely suffers for it.
It managed to score a 67 hour endurance rating in our battery test - a far cry from the whopping 119 hours of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 or the 91 hours of the Redmi 4 Prime. Both handsets have 4,100mAh battery packs at their disposal, as well as the 14nm Snapdragon 625, which has proven its power efficiency time and time over. Even the MediaTek Helio X20 version of the Redmi Note 4 managed to squeeze an 83 hour rating out of its 4,100mAh battery.
A less efficient Snapdragon 425, working its four cores overtime to keep up with the load, plus a smaller 3,120mAh battery pack really turned out to be a recipe for an average battery life. It's another significant deduction from the already dwindling value score of the Redmi 4a.
Display
Much to our surprise, the 5-inch 720p panel on the Redmi 4a turned out to be pretty decent. It seems the LCD unit was mostly spared from the cost-cutting, but sadly the same can't be said about its protective layer. Xiaomi claims it is some sort of hardened glass but, as we said earlier, it really gives off a "plasticky" vibe - it doesn't provide smooth swipes and it's prone to scratches.
As for the actual screen however, we've definitely seen worse and on much more expensive devices. It is not the brightest unit available, peaking at 475 nits and the higher light bleed in the blacks makes for a rather low contrast of 925. Still, to put the results into perspective, the Meizu M5s - one of the few competing offers in the ultra-budget segment- gives a pretty much identical performance. But then again, the Redmi 4 Prime and Redmi Note 4 both do notably better in the display department.
| Display test | 100% brightness | ||
| Black, cd/m2 | White, cd/m2 | ||
| 0.475 | 528 | 1112 | |
| 0.513 | 475 | 925 | |
| 0.322 | 484 | 1503 | |
| 0.73 | 679 | 929 | |
| 0.453 | 480 | 1060 | |
| 0.614 | 463 | 754 | |
| 0.426 | 407 | 955 | |
| 0.39 | 396 | 1021 | |
| 0.00 | 331 | ∞ | |
| 0.00 | 468 | ∞ | |
| 0.58 | 416 | 717 | |
| 0.36 | 333 | 928 | |
The part we really found surprising was color accuracy on the Redmi 4a. Even the Standard color mode provides an average DeltaE of 4.5 out of the box and a maximum of 7.8. Whites are a little strong, which makes it slightly cold, but still, it's an overall quite accurate color-wise.
Tweaking some of the ample display settings yielded even more impressive results. Using the Warm color mode results in an average deltaE of just 2.8 and a max of 6, again mostly due to a variance in white and grays. Bringing the brightness down from the 475nit maximum to 200nits corrected the white pretty well and left us with a very impressive average deltaE of 2.4 and a maximum of 4.8.
Sunlight legibility is on par with similar devices, like the regular Redmi 4 and Redmi 4 Prime. That is to say, it is not spectacular in any way, but still decent enough for outdoor use. The automatic contrast adjustment, baked into MIUI helps in this respect as well. Still, you should probably avoid direct sunlight.
Sunlight contrast ratio
-
Samsung Galaxy S8
4.768 -
Samsung Galaxy S8+
4.658 -
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+
4.615 -
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
4.439 -
OnePlus 3
4.424 -
Samsung Galaxy S7
4.376 -
HTC One A9
4.274 -
Samsung Galaxy Note7
4.247 -
Samsung Galaxy A3
4.241 -
OnePlus 3T
4.232 -
Google Pixel XL
4.164 -
ZTE Axon 7
4.154 -
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
4.124 -
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)
4.124 -
Samsung Galaxy Note5
4.09 -
Huawei Nexus 6P
4.019 -
OnePlus X
3.983 -
Vivo Xplay5 Elite
3.983 -
Oppo R7s
3.964 -
Apple iPhone 7
3.964 -
Huawei P9 Plus
3.956 -
Meizu Pro 6 Plus
3.935 -
Lenovo Moto Z
3.931 -
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
3.918 -
Samsung Galaxy C5
3.911 -
Samsung Galaxy C7
3.896 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
3.895 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 outdoor
3.879 -
Samsung Galaxy J2 outdoor
3.873 -
Samsung Galaxy A8
3.859 -
Sony Xperia XZs
3.818 -
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)
3.817 -
Motorola Moto X (2014)
3.816 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
3.804 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016) outdoor mode
3.802 -
Xiaomi Redmi Pro
3.798 -
LG V20 Max auto
3.798 -
Sony Xperia XZ
3.795 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
3.789 -
Apple iPhone 6s
3.783 -
Meizu Pro 5
3.781 -
Microsoft Lumia 650
3.772 -
Xiaomi Mi 6
3.767 -
Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
3.756 -
Oppo F1 Plus
3.709 -
Vivo X5Pro
3.706 -
Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017)
3.688 -
Apple iPhone SE
3.681 -
Huawei Mate 9
3.68 -
Samsung Galaxy A7
3.679 -
Meizu PRO 6
3.659 -
BlackBerry Priv
3.645 -
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3.588 -
LG G6
3.556 -
Apple iPhone 6s Plus
3.53 -
Motorola Moto Z Play
3.526 -
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016)
3.523 -
Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) outdoor mode
3.523 -
Acer Jade Primo
3.521 -
Microsoft Lumia 950
3.512 -
Oppo R7 Plus
3.499 -
nubia Z11
3.466 -
Huawei P10 Plus
3.456 -
HTC U Ultra
3.453 -
Samsung Galaxy J7
3.422 -
Meizu MX5
3.416 -
LG V20
3.402 -
Huawei P10
3.379 -
Oppo R9s
3.352 -
Honor 8 Pro
3.341 -
Oppo R7
3.32 -
Lenovo P2
3.316 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3.276 -
Nokia 6 (Chinese version)
3.244 -
Samsung Galaxy J2
3.235 -
Sony Xperia X Performance
3.234 -
Xiaomi Mi Note 2
3.228 -
Motorola Moto X Play
3.222 -
Oppo F3 Plus
3.218 -
Huawei Mate 9 Pro
3.206 -
Huawei P9
3.195 -
Lenovo Vibe Shot
3.113 -
Motorola Moto X Force
3.105 -
LG Nexus 5X
3.092 -
Huawei Mate S
3.073 -
Microsoft Lumia 640 XL
3.065 -
Sony Xperia XA1
3.012 -
Sony Xperia X
2.989 -
Huawei P10 Lite
2.974 -
Huawei Mate 8
2.949 -
Xiaomi Redmi 3S
2.913 -
Sony Xperia XA Ultra
2.906 -
LG G5
2.905 -
HTC One S
2.901 -
Xiaomi Redmi 3s Prime
2.893 -
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus
2.884 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (sRGB)
2.877 -
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
2.877 -
Sony Xperia Z5
2.876 -
Microsoft Lumia 550
2.851 -
Lenovo Moto M
2.813 -
Xiaomi Redmi 3 Pro
2.803 -
Sony Xperia Z5 compact
2.784 -
Meizu MX6
2.751 -
LG V10
2.744 -
Xiaomi Redmi 3
2.735 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (S625)
2.714 -
Meizu M5
2.71 -
Sony Xperia M5
2.69 -
Huawei P9 Lite
2.679 -
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime
2.679 -
Vivo V3Max
2.659 -
Xiaomi Mi Mix
2.658 -
Xiaomi Mi 4i
2.641 -
Xiaomi Redmi 4a
2.635 -
Sony Xperia XA
2.609 -
Motorola Moto G4 Plus
2.582 -
Motorola Moto G4 Plus (max auto)
2.582 -
Meizu M5s
2.58 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
2.574 -
LeEco Le Max 2
2.567 -
Microsoft Lumia 640
2.563 -
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2.563 -
Lenovo Moto G4
2.544 -
Lenovo K6 Note
2.544 -
Oppo F1
2.528 -
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2.525 -
Huawei Honor 7 Lite / Honor 5c
2.506 -
Sony Xperia M4 Aqua
2.503 -
Oppo F1s
2.481 -
Motorola Moto G
2.477 -
Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus
2.473 -
Huawei G8
2.471 -
Huawei nova
2.467 -
Sony Xperia Z
2.462 -
Lenovo Vibe K5
2.459 -
Meizu m3 max
2.447 -
Xiaomi Mi 4
2.424 -
HTC 10 evo
2.407 -
Huawei Honor 7
2.406 -
Sony Xperia E5
2.386 -
ZUK Z1 by Lenovo
2.382 -
HTC 10
2.378 -
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
2.378 -
Oppo F3
2.376 -
vivo V5 Plus
2.371 -
Meizu m1 note
2.362 -
Huawei nova plus
2.329 -
HTC One E9+
2.305 -
Alcatel One Touch Hero
2.272 -
Lenovo Vibe K4 Note
2.254 -
Sony Xperia C5 Ultra
2.253 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)
2.249 -
Sony Xperia C4 Dual
2.235 -
Xiaomi Mi Note
2.234 -
Motorola Moto G (2014)
2.233 -
Huawei P8
2.196 -
Meizu M5 Note
2.189 -
Huawei Honor 6
2.169 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 2
2.166 -
OnePlus Two
2.165 -
HTC One X
2.158 -
LG Aka
2.145 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (X20)
2.145 -
Archos 50 Diamond
2.134 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note
2.119 -
Xiaomi Mi 4S
2.095 -
Acer Liquid X2
2.084 -
Huawei P8lite
2.078 -
vivo V5
2.059 -
Moto G 3rd gen max manual
2.026 -
Xiaomi Mi 3
2.001 -
Xiaomi Mi Max
1.996 -
Sony Xperia E4g
1.972 -
OnePlus One
1.961 -
Meizu m3 note
1.923 -
BlackBerry Leap
1.892 -
Meizu m2 note
1.892 -
ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
1.759 -
Sony Xperia U
1.758 -
Asus Zenfone Selfie
1.68 -
Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen)
1.675 -
ZTE Nubia Z9
1.659 -
Jolla Jolla
1.605 -
Motorola Moto E
1.545 -
Sony Xperia M
1.473 -
Sony Xperia L
1.351 -
HTC Desire C
1.3 -
Meizu MX
1.221 -
Sony Xperia E
1.215
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up