GSMArena.com GSMArena.com

Tip us

2.0m
150k
RSS

EV

Merch

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Featured
  • Phone Finder
  • Deals
  • MerchNew
  • Coverage
  • Contact
ADVERTISEMENT

Samsung Galaxy Note9 performance compared to Galaxy S9+ and Note8

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (93)

Enrique 10 August 2018

Samsung Android Featured Hands-on

Now that we’ve got our hands on the Samsung Galaxy Note9, we’re able to make some comparisons between the Note8 and Galaxy S9+ in terms of performance.

We’ve got some numbers from an international dualSIM variant of the Galaxy Note9, so this one is powered by the Exynos 9810 CPU. We’re comparing it to both variants of the Galaxy S9+.

Starting with graphics performance, the Exynos-powered Note9 wasn’t at the top of any of the benchmark tests. The Galaxy S9+ with its Snapdragon 845 was able to get the best frame rates out of the graphic-focused GFX Bench tests.

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    61
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    47
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    45
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    43
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    42

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    34
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    25
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    24
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    23
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    20

GFX 3.1 Car scene (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    35
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    28
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    28
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    25
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    25

GFX 3.1 Car scene (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    20
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    15
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    14
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    13
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    13

The Note9 sees scores about 25% higher numbers than the Note8. Meanwhile, the Snapdragon 845-powered Galaxy S9+ still lies ahead, surpassing the Galaxy Note9 by about 6%.

AnTuTu 7

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    264044
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    248823
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    246660
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    201065

In GeekBench, the Note9 did better, though wasn't very far off from the Galaxy S9+'s score. In fact, GeekBench's scores favor the Exynos versions while Antutu favored the Snapdragon variants.

GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    9026
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    8883
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    8349
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    6784
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    6590

Single-core scores are far better on the Exynos 9810 than the Galaxy S9+'s Snapdragon 845. The difference in single-core scores has a much larger gap between the 9810 and the 845 than between the Exynos 8895 and the Snapdragon 835.

GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    3771
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    3642
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    2199
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    1987
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    1862

We tested a 128GB version of the Note9, which comes with 6GB of RAM. We wonder if the 512GB version of the phone with 8GB of RAM would perform any differently.

Samsung’s Water Carbon Cooling should make for better performance under extended periods of gaming or intensive use. Less heat means less CPU throttling and better performance for playing hours of Fortnite.

Related articles
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9 is up for pre-order in India Samsung Galaxy Note9 is up for pre-order in India
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9 promo videos are up Samsung Galaxy Note9 promo videos are up
  • Samsung Galaxy Watch hands-on Samsung Galaxy Watch hands-on
  • Samsung Galaxy Home: a Bixby-powered smart speaker is on the way Samsung Galaxy Home: a Bixby-powered smart speaker is on the way

Reader comments

?
  • Anonymous
  • 7XY
  • 13 Aug 2018

exactly real world usage is similar but the price tag is not, its more expensive than the s9+

  • Reply
A
  • Ahmed
  • KcP
  • 13 Aug 2018

How much is the price of this

  • Reply
?
  • Anonymous
  • U2T
  • 13 Aug 2018

True real world usage is similar

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 93

ADVERTISEMENT

Phone finder

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Huawei
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • LG
  • HTC
  • Motorola
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi
  • Google
  • Honor
  • Oppo
  • Realme
  • OnePlus
  • Nothing
  • vivo
  • Meizu
  • Asus
  • Alcatel
  • ZTE
  • Microsoft
  • Umidigi
  • Coolpad
  • Oscal
  • Sharp
  • Micromax
  • Infinix
  • Ulefone
  • Tecno
  • Doogee
  • Blackview
  • Cubot
  • Oukitel
  • Itel
  • TCL

All brands Rumor mill

ADVERTISEMENT

Top 10 by daily interest

  Device Daily hits  
1.OnePlus 1544,900
2.Samsung Galaxy A5622,682
3.Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra21,571
4.Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max19,675
5.Xiaomi 17 Pro Max19,629
6.Oppo Find X9 Pro19,245
7.Honor 500 Pro (China)18,674
8.Honor 50016,124
9.Samsung Galaxy A1715,915
10.Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro14,222

ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Tesla Robotaxi troubles grow with seven reported crashes in Austin Tesla Robotaxi troubles grow with seven reported crashes in Austin Kia delays the EV9 GT in the US as wellGoogle Maps on Android Auto to make navigating to EV chargers easier
ADVERTISEMENT

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS Youtube Instagram TikTok Facebook Twitter

© 2000-2025 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Tools Contact us Merch store Privacy Terms of use Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data