Samsung Galaxy A32 5G review Comments
- Panda eyes
- mE0
because its a very weak processor and targeted more for lower end A phones like the A21s and below. The Mediatek 720g in this phone is comparable to the SD 720
- Question Man
- k0M
Did this author actually read the A52 vs A52 5G reviews? as far as i'm aware there weren't any downgrades. in fact, the A52 5G is a better device by all measures
- Lol
- gJt
Pros - 4k video.
Cons - no 4k video.
Great article.
- Essen
- K8T
Phones like these were the reason that flagships were the only alternatives before the Moto G and the Chinese arrived. Moto seems to have lost its mojo. But say what you want about Xiaomi or BBK. They have 10 better alternatives under each of their sub brands than this.
- Anonymous
- TL%
The good thing is the battery life.
- hindisong.cc
- D07
why do manufacturers oversee the display resolution?. is 5g need of the hour than providing a FHD panel?
Don't manufacturers have a team for market research and doesn't that team analyse the consumer mindset and requirements.?
- Anonymous
- tDS
samsung has a mid-range 5G processor {exynos 880} why don't they use it
- Anonymous
- JT5
Some Cons are ridiculous.
8MP is not capable of 4K, still reviewer points.
No problem of no stereo for phone this price.
- kek
- GBh
I'll only say that I still like this "Velvet" look of the A32, compared to the design of the A52/A72
- Anonymous
- pJt
Another useless, oversized Samsung Slab (tm) for lumberjacks, ogres and the Jolly Green Giant.
- Anonymous
- vjX
The review makes it as if the 4G model is an option, when it isn't in many parts of the world where Samsung has decided to ship only the 5G version.
- Anonymous
- vjX
15 W charger is better than basic. Xperia 10 III redefined the meaning of basic with its 7.5 W charger.
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up