Without lab tests and camera comparison tool, the review is not of much use. Take note Gsmarena.
I have the same question, as do a lot of your readers probably. Why are some of the reviews different in format from the rest? I was anticipating your review of this smartphone, but was disappointed after seeing that it lacks Gsmarena's very useful and idiosyncratic lab tests.
I hope this won't turn out to be the new standard.
ASUS Zenfone Max Pro M1 is definitely a better option IMHO because of the 5000mAh battery, full 18:9 display, same android one experience, dedicated microsd slot with dual SIM functionality and most importantly, LOWER in price compared to Nokia 6.1 Plus.
"Also, worth mentioning is the ASUS ZenFone Max Pro M1, a phone that has the same chipset as the Nokia 6.1 Plus and a similar feature set, including a close to stock but not quite Android One experience. What it does add is a humongous 5000mAh battery, which can easily last two days for most people."
Something to add, GSMArena editor, "It also does not have a NOTCH that spoils the full screen experience."
There, fixed it for you.
Most awaited Nokia phone....well good luck next time.
Why some reviews are different?
This one and Huawei Nova 3 too.
Nice for one hand usage :)
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up