George399, 26 Sep 2023You brought a biased tuber and an ultrashort test, how is that successful? Pathetic By the way, a battery comparison just goes to show that despite the phone heating up slightly more, it did not get in the way of battery life.
George399, 28 Sep 202327w is SLOW, think https://youtu.be/wIfdM96iBEk?si=HNpsuP8J-7EXk0Ao
George399, 28 Sep 202327w is SLOW, think Yes it is slow but it is still classed as ''fast charging''
Here is explanation :
Basic charging is : 5V - 1A = 5W
Quick Charging is : 5V - 2A = 10W
Fast Charging is : 9V - 2A = 18W (apple has-> 5V-6A =30W)(samsung ->9Vx 2.77A= 25W)
Super fast charging is : 10V 4A = 40W (samsung 11V 4A = 45W)
Ultra fast Charging is 10V 6.5A =65W (Oppo SuperWooc 65)
Ultra fast charging 2 is 11V 7.3A=80W (Oppo SuperWooc 80W)
Flash Charging is 11V 9.1A = 100W (Oppo SuerWooc 100W)
There are of course now 240W (Realme)
If the iphone is limited to 30W you have to complain to apple not to me.. 🤷♂️
Cpt.Power, 27 Sep 2023They say its Titanium and whole Titanium is only in frame of the phone and only worth like 30 ... moreWell every smartphone is only frame amd middle chassis metal.. U can't expect screen to be metal right? 🙂 Back of the phone cannot be metal it wouldn't be good for wireless charging amd not good for battery there needs to be some isolation
I went to apole store in shopping centre and that titan looks awesome
George399, 25 Sep 2023What fast charging? Iphones have slow chargeThey have fast charging same like Samsung
Other Chinese androids has super charging or ultra fast charging which is from 80W or 100W
George399, 25 Sep 2023You can't be serious if that guy is your source 😂Not really no.. But you clearly seen the progress n?
very interested keeping on doing
Cpt.Power, 27 Sep 2023They say its Titanium and whole Titanium is only in frame of the phone and only worth like 30 ... moreThat's the raw cost of the material that is there, not the extra production costs. The titanium doesnt come shaped like an iphone
DXOMARK tested it and it on 2 Place.thats an amazing result.Just the Huawei 60Pro+ is ahead.I dont know how professionell the dudes on DXOMARK are but it seems that Apple did a super Job with the Camera.Even Professionel Photographer are stunned by its Performance.So Samsung and its useless Moonzoom is pretty much bummed.I have a S23Ultra but its the first Time were i was disapointed after i bought it.came from S7 Edge,S10+ And now the S23 Ultra.The Pics in good Light Conditions are almost the same quality(i m talking from the 1-3x Zoom Range)of course in low light the Ultra is absolutely stunning.I waited 4 Jears for this Phone,just to realise Samsung did just minor improvements.
No satellite calling? Fine. How about start the testing by cracking some walnuts first.
AnonD-1121190, 25 Sep 2023I like that titanimum.. Apple could remove notch for Pro MAx and it would look vey nice..
B... moreThey say its Titanium and whole Titanium is only in frame of the phone and only worth like 30 dollars in every device.
Its more aluminium or glass than titanium.
George399, 26 Sep 2023You brought a biased tuber and an ultrashort test, how is that successful? Pathetic You’re just trying to come up with every single excuse. If I had ever given you a 1h version of that, you would say ‘1h is not enough, I want 2h!’
I compared the periscope camera of my Pixel 7 Pro at 15x with the 15 Pro Max in a store and my impression was that the 7 Pro was the clear winner. I used Google's Night Sight mode whereas Apple didn't let me choose a night mode. The 7 Pro was far less noisy despite a similar exif exposure time. And usually (but not in all cases) it seemed to deliver more detail from distant objects. And even without Night Sight, the 7 Pro's periscope was far less noisy despite the higher megapixel count.
But note that I also compared the S23 Ultra with the 7 Pro (with its short Night Sight mode) at 360mm and the 7 Pro won this as well.
I have just seen some YouTube reviews of the 15 Pro Max camera and it seems that Apple doesn't use data from the periscope in order to improve the 3x image quality. My Pixel 7 Pro often performs quite well at 3x because it often uses data from the periscope camera for the center of the image (unless the light conditions are not good), though this image fusion isn't applied to the raw files.
Anonymous, 26 Sep 2023The move to be the first with 3nm chipset baffled me too. iPhone's user base have already... moreI have said that myself, and in most cases it is true. This would not appear to be such a case mind. In fairness they have been first to use new fab processes before (I think they were first to use 7nm 🤔), and it worked out well enough for them at that time. Will have to see how this plays out…..
Battery test was 3h inferior than 14 pro max
George399, 26 Sep 2023"If you don't like it don't be here" Literally the worst argument in the world.And totally wasted on you, your obsession with Apple being just too strong.
Jman, 26 Sep 2023I have the Pixel 6 Pro and I put it in a case from day 1. It's to keep the phone in mint ... moreEven cased, thanks to the Visor, the phone still has character. It looks different from the 7 and from the 8 too.
DaFink, 26 Sep 2023Well I’m going to interested to read this review, and all the comments about how GSMarena are ... moreThe move to be the first with 3nm chipset baffled me too. iPhone's user base have already convinced themselves that Apple only uses tech when it has matured so there was no need for Apple to try to be the first in anything. This kind of pokes a hole in that argument that Apple only uses tech that is mature enough.