Intel and Arm announce partnership on mobile chipset development Comments
NGC2841, 14 Oct 2023I disagree tho there's some cheap Loptop with Core-i3 for 350$ cheap as the same price of... morebut core i3 with chrome os is like overkill.
- NGC2841
- Tiu
you have to suffer, 19 Apr 2023yeah like intel core i3 at low price.. most core i3 or i5 powered chromebooks are expensive, ... moreI disagree tho there's some cheap Loptop with Core-i3 for 350$ cheap as the same price of a Midranger Phone but they come only with Intel integrated GPUs which is in the these recent gens do good enough to play most of games in low to med graphics..dont blame Intel for the pricing.... PCs and Loptops are Litterally more expensive why not try to earn 550dollars for a Corei5 with rtx3050?
Mampara, 17 Apr 2023Hope we get better Chromebook chipsets yeah like intel core i3 at low price..
most core i3 or i5 powered chromebooks are expensive, celery chromebooks are everywhere. i really hope intel discontinued their celeron lineup for good, so there are no future budget laptops that are powered with celeron.
- Sinnaoi
- JyX
ox, 13 Apr 2023here are some examples of many forget windows if you want to do something productive - 2023... moreOK if you are posting here such examples then please do look up the meaning of the term "on a regular basis"
- Anonymous
- UG4
ishreal, 14 Apr 2023Not sure how you see Intel's fabs "mostly unusable" since they hit their yield ... moreFact that they delayed launches.
If you delay, it means the current yields are unacceptable, impractical for mass production.
So, continue to make older design, and size.
- ishreal
- 0eS
Anonymous, 14 Apr 2023Yields also play a big part. Intel have terrible yield.. either they trying something new.. or... moreNot sure how you see Intel's fabs "mostly unusable" since they hit their yield targets and continue to fab enough chips for their orders. Are their yields fantastic? No. But they definitely are not bad.
- Mr. Anonymous
- 3SL
ishreal, 13 Apr 2023The nanometer indication is mostly inaccurate anyways since it's all based on transistor ... moreThat is true, but the 7nm TSMC went into production in 2018, while Intel 7 did in 2021.
Also, TSMC released 7nm+ in 2019, with density surpassing that of Intel 7 (which Intel still use to make their 13th gen CPUs).
- Anonymous
- gqb
Anonymous, 13 Apr 2023Finally, now Apple silicone have a contender 😎 Finally we can see windows PC running native A... moreWe already have Qualcomm chipset made for Windows PC, that's not the problem. The problem is Windows on ARM itself - it has to be on par with macOS with Silicon chipset.
- Anonymous
- UG4
ishreal, 13 Apr 2023The nanometer indication is mostly inaccurate anyways since it's all based on transistor ... moreYields also play a big part. Intel have terrible yield.. either they trying something new.. or simply did not catch up.
So what if they claim more density.. but most of it is broken or unusable? The less yield.. the more unprofitable (or release more i7 i3 i5.. while the perfect i9 is rare).. the more miss chance to perform R&D.. it's a vicious cycle.
So keep same nm.. make reliable chips with good yield.. or take the dive.. make smaller.. and risk bad yields. Or make bigger chips.. and risk bad yield.
Thats why intel now is below amd..
- Anonymous
- LHe
Mr. Anonymous, 13 Apr 2023"The Intel 18A process is basically a 1.8 nm technology." Nope, it's just a ... moreBy TSMC and Samsung merits 18A is 2nm node.
- Anonymous
- J07
Lots of highly educated software/ computer engineer takes in this comment section.
- Anonymous
- 7kk
2nd attempt at mobile processor development
- Mr. Anonymous
- mgK
Tt, 13 Apr 2023You don't know how it works. Intels 10nm is comparable to other companies 7nm so Intel na... moreYou said it yourself, Intel 3 is 5nm, so 18A will be 5nm++, which will also be delayed for at least 2 years, as history shows.
- ishreal
- 0eS
Mr. Anonymous, 13 Apr 2023"The Intel 18A process is basically a 1.8 nm technology." Nope, it's just a ... moreThe nanometer indication is mostly inaccurate anyways since it's all based on transistor density, which is, the true metric for size and efficiency. One fact that's relevant is that Intel's 10nm process is actually denser than TSMC's 7nm. Per pcgamer: "Intel reports a density of 100.76MTr/mm2 (mega-transistor per squared millimetre) for its 10nm process, while TSMC's 7nm process is said to land a little behind at 91.2MTr/mm2 (via Wikichip(opens in new tab))."
- ox
- DGV
Sinnaoi, 13 Apr 2023Blue screens on a regular basis? I suppose you are still on Windows XP or 95... Haven't s... morehere are some examples of many forget windows if you want to do something productive
- 2023 Nvidia working on driver fix for Windows BSOD, high CPU usage
"After performing a "clean installation" of this latest driver on a Lenovo P17 running fully upgraded Windows 11 with an NVIDIA RTX A5000, I then encountered three hard kernel crashes (BSOD), as well as two game crashes (Hogwarts Legacy) in the three days I ran this release," one user said.
- Microsoft: KB5021233 causes blue screens with 0xc000021a errors
- The issue was fixed in the KB5022282
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/january-10-2023-kb5022282-os-builds-19042-2486-19044-2486-and-19045-2486-9587e4e3-c2d7-48a6-86e2-8cd9146b47fd
Windows admins warned to patch critical MSMQ QueueJumper bug
the list goes on and on...
- Tt
- S1X
Mr. Anonymous, 13 Apr 2023"The Intel 18A process is basically a 1.8 nm technology."
Nope, it's just a ... moreYou don't know how it works. Intels 10nm is comparable to other companies 7nm so Intel named it Intel 7. Intel 3 is 5 nm
So 18A is way less than 5nm
Tip us
2.0m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up