The Android Freak, 11 Aug 2022There is no confusion. Moto G71/G82/G62 are equally good devices. Motorola is giving you choic... moreBasically very very similar phones,with different names for different markets,all these phones together are not available in a single country,so there shouldn't be any confusion!Unlike brands under BBK Umbrellas(Oppo,Vivo,Realme,OnePlus) !
The Android Freak, 11 Aug 2022There is no confusion. Moto G71/G82/G62 are equally good devices. Motorola is giving you choic... more32/42/52/62 are almost same device.
71/71s/82 are basically same phone.
Mmmma, 11 Aug 2022Why companies do this confusing us with similar names First Xiaomi now Motorola There is no confusion. Moto G71/G82/G62 are equally good devices. Motorola is giving you choice with these devices.
MRSTEK, 11 Aug 2022480/480+/690/695 are all based on 765/750, there's no huge difference. They share the sam... moreYes snapdragon 695 has been good for battery life.
rizki1, 11 Aug 2022hmm but xiaomi does not forget to provide NFC, IR blaster, ingress protection, AMOLED screen a... moreTheir devices are good for custom roms only.
rizki1, 11 Aug 2022hmm but xiaomi does not forget to provide NFC, IR blaster, ingress protection, AMOLED screen a... moreXiaomi does a lot of cost cutting in RF system and does not pay royalty to Qualcomm. That's why their device performs quiet poorly in network speeds.
No OIS? Can be added via sw update?
Mmmma, 11 Aug 2022Why companies do this confusing us with similar names First Xiaomi now Motorola Just to confuse the average buyer.
Anonymous, 11 Aug 2022Does not matter price.
Even a $90 should have type C.
By the way, C 3.1 is only $5 more ... moreThere's a reason, and it is fairly interesting. These brands use private protocols which are not compatible with standard USB3.0 and PD. They may alter pin definitions and embed chips(like e-marker for PD PPS) to provide higher power. So...there may be some compatibility problems, some of them just do not want to solve them(extra costs awaits) and choose 2.0 for less complexity.
There are two instances of phones with 3.1 with private protocol fast charging, the OP8T and Black Shark 5 Pro(120W). Interestingly, they are shipped with dedicated A-to-C cable for fast charging, and those cables out of the box are not capable of transmitting data at USB 3.0 speed! You must find another 3.0-rated USB-C cable to reach the top speed!
rizki1, 11 Aug 2022dude hahaha no Xiaomi phones with microUSB for same price like this Motorola.Does not matter price.
Even a $90 should have type C.
By the way, C 3.1 is only $5 more than C2.0.
Xiaomi still puts C2.0 on phones sold over €1000.
To piss off Apple and chinese brands, India is considering making usb C mandatory.
KondriX, 11 Aug 2022'The tablet has stereo speakers and two microphones on board.' I guess you mean the phone?Oops, the phone indeed - the G62 tablet has four speakers 😁
MRSTEK, 11 Aug 2022480/480+/690/695 are all based on 765/750, there's no huge difference. They share the sam... moreAlso has Cortex A78 cores which use less power and offer high perfomance compare to 480/765/750
Anonymous, 11 Aug 2022Xiaomi still makes phones with microUSB. Not all their phones have NFC. dude hahaha no Xiaomi phones with microUSB for same price like this Motorola.
480/480+/690/695 are all based on 765/750, there's no huge difference. They share the same GPU and many other specs. However 695 has the best 6nm node among them.
rizki1, 11 Aug 2022hmm but xiaomi does not forget to provide NFC, IR blaster, ingress protection, AMOLED screen a... moreXiaomi still makes phones with microUSB.
Not all their phones have NFC.
Anonymous, 11 Aug 2022If it was xiaomi, surely would trade 695 for 480+. hmm but xiaomi does not forget to provide NFC, IR blaster, ingress protection, AMOLED screen and fast charger to their phones.
'The tablet has stereo speakers and two microphones on board.' I guess you mean the phone?
If it was xiaomi, surely would trade 695 for 480+.
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up