HoldEm, 05 Oct 2019When others released their foldables, they're not going to cost less than $2000 for sure. So s... moreAnd they will all fail on price as well. What does that have to do with my post?
anonymous, 06 Oct 2019If you can show me proof that they didn't say it was 200,000 fold, then I will believe you. If... moreYour claim does not hold
SAMSUNG FAN, 07 Oct 2019you cant even get a phone that fast. now your talking? funnyFunny i bet you always have to scold me for no major reason.
Anonymous, 07 Oct 2019bs comments , who in the world will fold this phone like that robot? non sense hate. im not a ... moreActually no, a human will be more brutal in some aspects to the screen than the folding robot as we will most likely use one hand that will exert an uneven force to the hinge than the robots claws to the edge claws(which was why they had to be recalled). and gentler in other aspects as we wont be folding the device for hours on end as to accumulate enough heat due to friction to damage the device
anonymous, 06 Oct 2019To you of course.Your choice of preposition seems to be incorrect because your sentence doesn't make any sense. Except to you, of course.
bs comments , who in the world will fold this phone like that robot? non sense hate. im not a fanboy of Samsung but most comments are plain s2pid.. just be thankful that tech evolved tat. yes for me this is still prototype device, but hats off to Samsung for being innovative not Chinese craps just being copycat.
AnonD-731363, 04 Oct 2019But not worth the 2000 and it was folded by device humans would fold it with different strengh... moreyou cant even get a phone that fast. now your talking? funny
Anonymous, 06 Oct 2019Don't be blinded by hate.To you of course.
Anonymous , 05 Oct 2019Sorry, a company with a huge reputation like Samsung shouldn't be lying in the first place. It... moreDon't be blinded by hate.
These Samsung jokes out in full force
I watched the video, and I'm surprised the phone survived as long as it did... the robot wasn't gentle at all, and it's folding the phone pretty fast...
Steven, 05 Oct 2019Why is this test deemed flawed by people in the comments when this is basically the very same ... moreThere are many factors that are definitely different, the speed of the bend, the strength applied to it, the timeframe of the test. You don't even know anything about the original test and you say this one is completely faithful to that one, when this test is not even faithful to regular daily usage.
Baykko, 05 Oct 2019Samsung never said the phone would last 200.000 fold if folded by a violent robot in a period ... moreIf you can show me proof that they didn't say it was 200,000 fold, then I will believe you. If not, then my claim still holds.
Anonymous , 05 Oct 2019It is not about unfair or not unfair. This is about a company with a huge reputation like Sams... moreSamsung never said the phone would last 200.000 fold if folded by a violent robot in a period of 6-7 hours. They didn't lie and you are just trying to be hateful or funny which is even worse.
Do people realize Samsung has no need to try to push the foldable form factor before anyone else? They could focus on the next Mega AMOLED and make millions since they are probably the biggest screen supplier, instead its trying to make a name for itself and motivate both consumers and other companies to take the next step in mobile technologies.
Anonymous, 05 Oct 2019But then again, you are also not folding the Phone perfectly like a robot that is in a control... moreYou are not folding it like a robot but also you dont slam it 100 times a second for few hours as this stupidly designed thing does
Anonymous, 04 Oct 2019Lol such a expensive phone and will last only 5 years?
My nokia phone survived 10+ years.yea and your Nokia definitely has all the hardware that Fold has.
Besides i heard YOUR Nokia is also FOLDABLE
Flawed test, it was going way too fast , it was generating way to much heat and friction beacause of the speed.
Why is this test deemed flawed by people in the comments when this is basically the very same test Samsung used themselves.
Using the same test under very similar conditions they got a number that's around 40% lower than what Samsung marketed.
It's pure marketing lie and Samsung should be held responsible, end of story.
I will be opening this phone 5 times a day - at 120000 folds thats 65 years worth of use.
No, people will not be opening their phone 182 times per day.
Anonymous , 05 Oct 2019Sorry, a company with a huge reputation like Samsung shouldn't be lying in the first place. It... moreits not just samsung , Apple lie all the time as well , least with samsung should a product have a major problem they recall it , apple never recall its iphones , they just blame thier users
Tip us
2.0m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up