The Honor 6 shows up well geared for battle. It utilizes an in-house HiSilicon Kirin 920 chipset with an octa-core processor. The processor is based on ARM's big.LITTLE architecture and uses four Cortex-A15 and four Cortex-A7 cores capable of working simultaneously. In the Honor 6 the Cortex-A15 cores are clocked at 1.7GHz, while the energy-efficient Cortex-A7 ones tick at 1.3GHz.
A somewhat dated Mali-T628 GPU is in charge of graphics, but should handle the 1080p resolution well enough as it has proven in the Exynos versions of the Samsung Galaxy S5 and Galaxy Note 3. Huawei has been generous with the operating memory and the Honor 6 is equipped with a solid 3 gigs of RAM.
It all adds up to a powerful package on paper and we got down to business to see how that translates in actual performance. The first set of tests, Antutu 5.0, Geekbench 3 and Basemark OS II test the CPU and overall system performance.
In Antutu, the Honor 6 held its own against the current crop of flagships, posting comparable results to the Galaxy S5 with Snapdragon 801 inside and slightly trailing behind the One (M8) and Xperia Z3 compact, the latter with half the pixels.
GeekBench 3 tells a similar story, with the Honor 6 on par with the Galaxy S5, only this time the Sony and HTC flagships show lower numbers. The point we're trying to make is that the Honor 6 is competing with the big boys out there.
Higher is better
Higher is better
The Honor 6 didn't fare as well in Basemark OS II, where its overall score was similar to the LG G2 which sports a Snapdragon 800 and 2 gigs of RAM. The top here is occupied by the stock-Android LG Nexus 5 and the Xiaomi Mi 4, miles ahead of the Huawei offering.
Higher is better
The CPU-specific parts of the benchmark, however, show that the Honor 6 was a respectable performer in single-core performance and at the top of the chart in multi-core numbers. All this suggests that probably a lack of software optimizations prevents the Honor 6 from shining in the combined score.
Higher is better
Higher is better
Time to move on to graphics performance, and this is one area where the Honor 6 disappoints, but mostly due to the high standards it set for itself. The now ageing Mali-T628 is far from the best performers. In Basemark X the Huawei handset posted an unimpressive score and the flagships it beat in the previous chapter are retaliating.
Higher is better
The Honor 6 did somewhat better in GFXBench, but still took quite a beating. In the T-Rex part of the benchmark it posted scores comparable to the Adreno 320 in the Snapdragon 600-equipped Galaxy S4 and the Lenovo Vibe X2. The more intense Manhattan portion is a closer run with the current flagship crowd, but these still posted about 50% better results than the Honor 6.
Higher is better
Higher is better
Higher is better
Higher is better
Web browsing performance was mostly unimpressive. The figures in Kraken 1.1 were on par with the LG Nexus 5 - good, but not great. In Java-script-intensive BrowserMark 2.1, on the other hand, the scores are mediocre. If it's any consolation, the Xiaomi Mi4 is not a good performer here either. As always, these numbers come from tests with the stock browser, while Google Chrome consistently posted better results, though not by much.
Lower is better
Higher is better
To sum it all up, benchmark performance was a mixed bag. The excellent impression left after Antutu and GeekBench was marred by unremarkable scores in the graphics department, and things didn't get much better when it came to web browsing.
That being said, the Honor 6 never got in the way of day-to-day use and the user experience didn't suffer from any lag or hiccups. Tapping the task switcher shows a reading of available RAM and that rarely got below 1GB, regardless of usage. If intensive 3D gaming is not on top of your list of priorities, the Honor 6 will not disappoint.
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up